Cedric R. Allen v. Robert G. Borg

45 F.3d 435 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cedric R. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 12, 1994. * Decided Dec. 20, 1994. Before: BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Cedric R. Allen is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claim against current and former prison officials. Allen claims that the officials violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by housing him with a violent cellmate who destroyed his television and by misplacing his inmate grievance forms which related to the property loss. The district court granted the officials' summary judgment motion. We affirm. STANDARD OF REVIEW 3 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Allen, we must…