Ramsis Halim Boules v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
45 F.3d 435·1994 WL 718873
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 199492-70582California2,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

45 F.3d 435 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ramsis Halim BOULES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70582. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 8, 1994. * Decided Dec. 23, 1994. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramsis Halim Boules, a Coptic Christian from Egypt, appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of deportation and voluntary departure. Because we find that Boules has failed to allege facts sufficient to establish a "well-founded fear of persecution," we affirm the denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We remand, however, for reconsideration of voluntary departure. I. 3 Boules entered the United States in August, 1983, as a nonimmigrant visitor and did not leave. On December 15, 1986, the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") issued Boules an Order to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.