Victor Estrada v. James Gomez A. Olivarez, Warden

45 F.3d 435 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victor ESTRADA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ; A. Olivarez, Warden, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-15895. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Dec. 28, 1994. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Victor Estrada, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the denied of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his twelve-year sentence imposed following his conviction for six counts of sale or transportation of cocaine. Estrada contends that he was denied due process at sentencing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the denial of a habeas petition. Hendricks v. Zenon, 993 F.2d 664, 668 (9th Cir.1993). "Absent a showing of fundamental unfairness, a state court's misapplication of its own sentencing laws does not justify federal habeas relief." Christian v. Rhode, No.…