In Re Wallace W. Mading, Debtor. Wallace W. Mading v. Ronald D. Shepherd Ramona Shepherd Ralph L. Shepherd Virginia v. Shepherd Gene Huntley

45 F.3d 436 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Wallace W. MADING, Debtor. Wallace W. MADING, Appellant, v. Ronald D. SHEPHERD; Ramona Shepherd; Ralph L. Shepherd; Virginia V. Shepherd; Gene Huntley, Appellees. No. 93-35442. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 1994. Decided Dec. 27, 1994. 1 Before: KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges and REAL, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellant WALLACE MADING (MADING) appeals from a judgment of the District Court affirming an order of the Bankruptcy Court granting summary judgment denying discharge of a state court judgment for actual and constructive fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligence. The denial of the discharge in bankruptcy was based on 11 USC Sec. 523 (a)(2)(A) that provides Sec. 523 Exceptions to discharge 4 (a) A discharge ... does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt-- 5 (1) * * * 6 (2) for money, property, services ... to the extent…