United States v. Andres Hernandez

45 F.3d 437 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andres HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50128. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 2, 1994. * Decided Dec. 19, 1994. Before: GIBSON, ** HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM *** Andres Hernandez appeals his conviction and 262-month sentence, following entry of guilty pleas, for two counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Hernandez contends that the district court erred by: (1) denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea before sentencing; (2) increasing his offense level by two levels for obstruction of justice under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3C1.1; and (3) denying him a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3E1.1. We affirm. 1 * Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea 2 Hernandez contends the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because he intended on…