United States v. Dana Francis Hill

45 F.3d 437 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dana Francis HILL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50287. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Dec. 27, 1994. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dana Hill appeals his sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release. Hill contends that the district court violated his due process rights by sentencing him based upon unreliable information. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and review de novo the legality of a sentence. United States v. Davila-Escovedo, 36 F.3d 840, 842 (9th Cir.1994). We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Hill was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1) and was sentenced to ten months imprisonment and two years of supervised release. The government alleged that while on supervised release, Hill committed…