United States v. Robert Ray Floyd

45 F.3d 437 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Ray FLOYD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10166. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Dec. 28, 1994. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Ray Floyd appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion requesting that the court amend his presentence report (PSR) to reflect findings made at the time of sentencing which resolved disputed factual sentencing issues. Floyd contends that Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) required the district court to amend the PSR to reflect these factual findings. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and reverse and remand with instructions. 3 Where a district court resolves disputed factual matters at sentencing, the ruling on those matters must be attached to the copy of the PSR transmitted to the Bureau of Prisons. See, e.g., United…