United States v. Daniel Fernando Wilson

45 F.3d 438 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Fernando WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50192. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Dec. 27, 1994. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Fernando Wilson appeals his conviction, following a conditional guilty plea, to one count of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a), and one count of using a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c). Wilson contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial was violated. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the denial of a motion to dismiss based upon the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. United States v. Beamon, 992 F.2d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir.1993). We review…