United States v. Juan Orozco-Romero Pedro Baldovinos Garcia

45 F.3d 438 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan OROZCO-ROMERO; Pedro Baldovinos Garcia, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-10646, 93-10674. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Dec. 21, 1994. 1 Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Juan Orozco-Romero and Pedro Baldovinos Garcia appeal their sentences following their convictions for violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 and 841. Both contend that the district court erroneously denied them three-level reductions for playing mitigating roles pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.2. Orozco-Romero also contends that the district court erred in denying him a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 3E1.1. We affirm. 4 The district court did not misinterpret U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.2 to preclude a mitigating role reduction because of the conspiracy charge. Rather, the…