United States v. Lawrence Doby Wilson

45 F.3d 438 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lawrence Doby WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-35312. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Dec. 28, 1994. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence Doby Wilson appeals the district court's denial of his fourth motion brought under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 challenging his convictions for wire fraud, mail fraud, and transporting fraudulently obtained money in interstate commerce. Wilson contends that (1) he was forced to trial in violation of the Speedy Trial Act less than 30 days after the filing of a superseding indictment; (2) appellate counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge the Speedy Trial Act violation in Wilson's direct appeal; and (3) he was not arraigned on the superseding indictment prior to trial. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review de novo the…