Intercontinental Travel Marketing, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Gateway National Bank

Good Law
45 F.3d 1278·94 Daily Journal DAR 18162·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36449·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9762
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 199492-16507California3,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brunetti, J.

In this appeal, we address the effect of a claimant’s failure to pursue administrative remedies before the expiration of the claims bar date specified in the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”). We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Because we find that the district court properly dismissed this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we affirm.

I. FACTS

On or about July 25,1989, Intercontinental Travel Marketing (“ITM”) and Gateway National Bank (“GNB”) entered into a Merchant Bankcard Agreement. On January 9, 1990, ITM filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona against GNB and Southwestern States Bankcard Association (“SSBA”), alleging breach of the terms of the Agreement. (SSBA processed the credit transactions between ITM and GNB.) On February 15, 1990, after GNB had been placed in receivership, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assumed control of GNB. In an order dated March 8, 1990, ITM and the FDIC entered a stipulation substituting the FDIC as defendant in the lawsuit. In furtherance of its role as receiver, the FDIC executed a purchase and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.