Anderson

Anderson v. County of Kern

Bad Law
45 F.3d 1310·95 Daily Journal DAR 623·1995 WL 11121·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 544·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 349
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 199518-15089California3,146 words

Opinion

Opinion

Poole, J.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, the district court entered a permanent injunction in favor of inmates at five Kern County jails. The inmates, who are pretrial detainees and convicted prisoners, appeal the district court’s refusal to enjoin prison officials from placing mentally disturbed or suicidal prisoners in safety cells. The county defendants cross-appeal the district court’s (1) injunction requiring prison officials to develop a policy regarding joint exercise and day room access for prisoners in administrative segregation, (2) injunction requiring prison officials to provide non-inmate translators for Spanish-speaking inmates seeking medical care, and (3) holding that their former dental and vision care policies were inadequate. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

Safety Cells

The inmates contend that the district court should have enjoined as unconstitutional Kern County’s use of safety cells for suicidal and mentally disturbed inmates. Safety cells are padded cells that are used to temporarily confine violent or suicidal prisoners so they cannot hurt themselves.

The convicted inmates’ challenge is evaluated under the Eighth Amendment, and the pretrial detainees’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.