Dev Anand Sheetal Anand Arachana Anand v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dev ANAND; Sheetal Anand; Arachana Anand, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70872. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 15, 1994. * Decided Jan. 24, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dev Anand, an ethnic Indian citizen of Fiji, and his two daughters petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") upholding the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of their application for asylum and withholding of deportation. The Board concluded that the Anands failed to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, nationality, religion, or political opinion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We deny the petition. 3 * Section 208(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1158 (a) authorizes the…