Blue-Sky v. Gomez

Good Law
46 F.3d 1138·1995 WL 21399·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7175
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 19, 199594-15539California557 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard BLUE-SKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director, Teena Farmon, Warden CCWF, R. E. Stebbins, Correctional Officer, C. Castillo; Mary Harris, Office Asst., and D. Shelton, Investigations Captain, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15539. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Jan. 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Richard Blue-Sky appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her request for injunctive relief in her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction to review the denial of Blue-Sky's request for injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1). We review de novo the denial of a request for injunctive relief, see Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 12 F.3d 901, 907 (9th Cir. 1993), and we affirm. 1 3 In her complaint, Blue-Sky challenged the conditions of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.