Associated Diesel Service & Equipment Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Terex Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee. Associated Diesel Service & Equipment Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Terex Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant

Good Law
46 F.3d 1138·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7179
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 199593-55410California1,919 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. ASSOCIATED DIESEL SERVICE & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. TEREX CORPORATION, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee. ASSOCIATED DIESEL SERVICE & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. TEREX CORPORATION, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant. Nos. 93-55410, 93-55469. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 1, 1994. Decided Jan. 20, 1995. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 This appeal and cross-appeal arise from Terex Corporation's ("Terex") termination of its Dealer Sales and Service Agreement with Associated Diesel Service & Equipment Company ("Associated"). After the termination, Associated filed this action against Terex for fraud and breach of contract. Terex counterclaimed, alleging that Associated never paid $159,380 for parts ordered and received. At the close of the evidence in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.