Gerald Glen Boyden v. Barry Rubin Working Alternatives, Inc.

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gerald Glen BOYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry RUBIN; Working Alternatives, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56356. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gerald Glen Boyden, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Working Alternatives, Inc., the owner and operator of a halfway house under contract to the federal government, and its employee Barry Rubin. Boyden alleged that the defendants violated his constitutional rights by delaying the approval and submission of his parole release plan and thereby delaying his parole from October 25, 1991 to November 25, 1991. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 In determining whether a complaint states a claim, all allegations of material fact…