Edward E. Allen v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc. Credit Bureau, Inc.

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward E. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; Credit Bureau, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35074. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward E. Allen, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc. ("Equifax") as time-barred. In his complaint, Allen alleged that Equifax violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681 et seq., by furnishing a copy of Allen's credit report to the FBI without valid authorization. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 An action under the FCRA must be brought within two years "from the date on which the liability arises." 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681p. The only…