Arturo M. Bowmane v. Vince G. Swinney Justice Court Dorothy Nash Holmes Jo Ann Wilson Judicial District Court

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arturo M. BOWMANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vince G. SWINNEY; Justice Court; Dorothy Nash Holmes; Jo Ann Wilson; Judicial District Court, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15285. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arturo M. Bowmane, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against state court judges, a prosecutor, and public defender. Judgment was entered after the district court dismissed Bowmane's amended complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d), and Bowmane failed to take advantage of the opportunity to file a second amended complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992), and affirm. 3 Section…