Vance Edward Bradley v. Samuel A. Lewis

Good Law
46 F.3d 1138·1995 WL 40360·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7184
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 199593-17095California278 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vance Edward BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17095. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 31, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Vance Edward Bradley appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant prison officials in Bradley's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action raising identical claims to those recently decided by this court in Casey v. Lewis, No. 93-17169, slip op. 15965 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 1994). Bradley is a member of the class of Arizona state prisoners who obtained significant injunctive relief in Casey, and the district court properly found that Bradley obtained his requested injunctive relief through the class action result in Casey. 3 Bradley's contention that he is also entitled to punitive damages against prison officials…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.