George Arshal v. United States

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. George ARSHAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35437. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George Arshal appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of his civil rights action against the United States. Arshal alleged that a former United States Court of Claims judge violated Arshal's due process rights by conspiring with the United States in order to defeat a patent claim which Arshal brought against the United States Navy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We vacate and remand with instructions to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 3 Arshal contends that the district court erred by dismissing his claim against the United States because the…