Victoria E. Aguayo, Regional Director v. New Breed Leasing Corporation

Good Law
46 F.3d 1138·1995 WL 7506·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7165
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 199594-56215California680 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victoria E. AGUAYO, Regional Director, Petitioner-Appellee, v. NEW BREED LEASING CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-56215. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 5, 1994. * Decided Jan. 6, 1995. Before: FARRIS, POOLE and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 A. The district court did not abuse its discretion in granting an interim injunction against New Breed pursuant to section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 160 (j). New Breed was not obligated to hire Maersk's employees, but if it refused to hire them because of their union affiliation, or as a device to avoid any duty to recognize and bargain with their union, it violated sections 8(a)(3) and (1) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (a)(3) & (1). Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., 417 U.S. 249 , 262 n. 8 (1974); Kallmann v. NLRB, 640 F.2d 1094, 1100 (9th Cir.1981). It is undisputed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.