Rustam Ali v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rustam ALI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent No. 94-70014. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Dec. 15, 1994. * Decided: Jan. 12, 1995. Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. 94-70014 I&NS No. Atq-qee-uag. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rustam Ali, an ethnic Indian citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of a ruling of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. The Board concluded that Ali failed to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, nationality, religion, or political opinion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We deny the petition. 3 * Section 208(a) of the…