Brian v. Gugin

Good Law
46 F.3d 1138·1995 WL 11165·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7168
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 199594-35392California932 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1138 75 A.F.T.R.2d 95 -830, 95-1 USTC P 50,067 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ralph BRIAN; Karen Brian; Koreen Morgan; and Robert L. Chapple, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Phylis J. GUGIN; James L. Mason; Cheryl Mosby; Richard Owens; Special Agent Hines, of the IRS; Sid Brown, Madison County Prosecutor; Greg Moffit, Madison County Sheriff; and Pat Molloy, U.S. Attorney, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35392. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1994, as to Appellees. Submitted Dec. 8, 1994, as to Appellants. * Decided Jan. 10, 1995. Before: NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ralph and Karen Brian, Koreen Morgan, and Robert Chapple ("Taxpayers") filed the instant pro se complaint in federal district court, seeking damages and injunctive relief against a United States Attorney, five IRS agents, a county prosecutor, and a county sheriff. The district court granted the defendants' motions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.