Manuel Flores Campos v. City of San Diego Cesar Castro, Joseph Wood

46 F.3d 1139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Manuel Flores CAMPOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; Cesar Castro, Joseph Wood, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55582. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1994. Decided Jan. 11, 1995. Before: CANBY, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Because the parties are familiar with the facts of the case, we will not recite them here. We find no abuse of discretion in either of the district court's evidentiary rulings to which Mr. Flores assigns error. Nor do we find that the court prejudiced the jury against Flores by its actions in examining Flores' damages expert. 3 We review the district court's evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion, United States v. Blaylock, 20 F.3d 1458, 1462 (9th Cir.1994), and will reverse such rulings only if such nonconstitutional error more likely than not affected the verdict. United States v. Corona, 34 F.3d 876, 882…