Leslie E. Carter v. R. Buie

Good Law
46 F.3d 1139·1995 WL 37334·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7474
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 199594-16654California580 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leslie E. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. BUIE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16654. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 30, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Leslie Carter appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing as a sanction for violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 Carter's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that his right of access to the courts and his right to a personal appearance before the state Board of Control were violated by prison officials' loss of some of his personal property and 300 pages of the transcript of Carter's criminal trial. 3 On March 9, 1994, the magistrate judge issued an order directing Carter to show cause why he had not violated Rule 11(b) and why sanctions, including dismissal, should not be entered against him due to what…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.