Louis T. Cervantes v. Samuel A. Lewis Sam Sublett and Glen Parin

46 F.3d 1139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louis T. CERVANTES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS; Sam Sublett; and Glen Parin, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15838. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis T. Cervantes, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that the housing conditions at the State Prison in Tucson, Arizona violated the Eighth Amendment. Cervantes also attempts to appeal the district court's denial of his motion for preliminary injunctive relief alleging that prison officials confiscated his legal materials. We dismiss Cervantes's appeal as moot. See Johnson v. Moore, 948 F.2d 517, 519 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam). 3 On appeal of the summary judgment order, Cervantes seeks only injunctive…