Curtis L. Carter v. U.S. Postal Service United States of America

46 F.3d 1139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Curtis L. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56557. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Curtis L. Carter appeals pro se the district courts dismissal of his third cause of action which alleged wrongful and erroneous termination by the United States Postal Service. Carter alleged that he was terminated from his position on the basis of his race, sex, and age. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . See Anderson v. Allstate, 630 F.2d 677, 680-81 (9th Cir.1980) (subsequent entry of judgment validates a prematurely filed notice of appeal). We affirm. 3 In the district court, Carter did not oppose the defendants' motion to dismiss his third cause of action. For this reason, he cannot…