Kenneth William Brown, Jr. v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent

46 F.3d 1139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth William BROWN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-35544. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kenneth W. Brown, Jr., an Oregon state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition, challenging his conviction for burglary and robbery. 1 Brown contends that his due process rights were violated because the state breached the plea agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . After reviewing de novo the district court's denial of Brown's habeas corpus petition, see Robbins v. Christianson, 904 F.2d 492, 494 (9th Cir. 1990), we affirm. 3 "Plea agreements are contractual in nature and are measured by contract law standards." United States v. De La Fuente, 8 F.3d…