Victor Evangelista, Lolita Evangelista Krystin Evangelista v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

46 F.3d 1140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victor EVANGELISTA, Lolita Evangelista; Krystin Evangelista, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70414. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 14, 1994. * Decided Feb. 2, 1995. Before: TANG, REINHARDT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Victor Evangelista, Lolita Evangelista, and Krystin Evangelista petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal's ("BIA") denial of their motion to reopen deportation proceedings. The Evangelistas have been found deportable under Sec. 241(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (a)(1). Victor was charged with failure to possess valid labor certification, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (a)(14), and with fraud or willful misrepresentation of a material fact, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (a)(19). All three were found deportable under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (a)(20), for…