Artie Ray Dufur v. John Sullivan, Warden Richard H. Rison, Warden

46 F.3d 1140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Artie Ray DUFUR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John SULLIVAN, Warden; Richard H. Rison, Warden, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-55746. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 30, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Artie Ray Dufur, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 habeas petition. Dufur contends that the United States Parole Commission violated his due process rights in calculating his presumptive release date by: (1) disobeying a court order and erroneously applying a regulation; and (2) vindictively adding two years to his reconsideration hearing, following remand by the district court. We review de novo, Meador v. Knowles, 990 F.2d 503, 506 (9th Cir. 1993), and affirm in part and vacate and remand in part. 3 Our review of a Parole Commission decision is…