Joseph Figueroa, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Campbell Industries, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Good Law
46 F.3d 1140·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7193
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 199593-55936California1,803 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph FIGUEROA, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. CAMPBELL INDUSTRIES, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 93-55936, 93-55945. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Dec. 9, 1994. Decided: Jan. 13, 1995. 1 Before: BROWNING, and GOODWIN Circuit Judges, and QUACKENBUSH, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendant Campbell Industries appeals from the district court's judgment following a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff Joseph Figueroa under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. App. Sec. 688, and Mr. Figueroa cross-appeals the trial court's judgment setting off, from the verdict, the amount of benefits Mr. Figueroa had previously received under state workers' compensation statutes and the Longshore & Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. Sec. 901 et seq. 4 The district court had original jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1333 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.