Nancy Holland v. Evenflo Corporation, a Foreign Corp., D/B/A Evenflo Juvenile Co., a Foreign Corp. And Spalding and Evenflo Companies, a Foreign Corp.

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nancy HOLLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant v. EVENFLO CORPORATION, a foreign corp., d/b/a Evenflo Juvenile Co., a foreign corp.; and Spalding and Evenflo Companies, a foreign corp., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-36073. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 9, 1995. Decided Feb. 7, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON, BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiff Nancy Holland appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the defendant, Evenflo Corporation. 4 Holland filed a products liability action against Evenflo, alleging construction or design defect of a child's car seat. The district court granted summary judgment to Evenflo on the grounds that Holland failed to produce evidence to create a triable issue of fact that (1) the car seat was not reasonably safe in construction or design; and (2) the defective car seat was a proximate…