Makis A. Havadjias Haralambos Havadjias v. Vanguard Insurance Company

Good Law
46 F.3d 1141·1995 WL 41396·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7233
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 1, 199593-56693California1,371 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Makis A. HAVADJIAS; Haralambos Havadjias, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56693. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Feb. 1, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Makis A. Havadjias and Haralambos Havadjias ("the Havadjiases") appeal pro se the district court's order granting defendant's motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(g). The district court imposed $25,000 in sanctions against the Havadjiases for filing a frivolous action and for conducting frivolous discovery. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Background 4 This action is related to a prior litigation involving the same parties. Vanguard Insurance Company ("Vanguard") had issued a dwelling insurance policy on a property owned by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.