In Re Isidor Friedman and Dorothy Friedman, Debtor. Isidor Friedman Dorothy Friedman v. Philip C. Grace David A. Siegel

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Isidor FRIEDMAN and Dorothy Friedman, Debtor. Isidor FRIEDMAN; Dorothy Friedman, Appellants, v. Philip C. GRACE; David A. Siegel, Appellees. No. 93-55823. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 12, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 27, 1995. 1 Before: CANBY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Because the parties are familiar with the facts of the case, we will not recite them here. The bankruptcy court correctly concluded that all elements necessary for the doctrine of res judicata to operate were met, and thus did not err in granting Grace's motion for summary judgment on the issue of non-dischargeability. We therefore affirm the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's decision. 4 Grace and Siegel filed their original objection to discharge in the first Friedman bankruptcy pursuant to the then-applicable non-dischargeability statute, section 17(a)(2) of the…