Ivan Hernandez v. Robert W. Olding

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ivan HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert W. OLDING, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15673. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ivan Hernandez, an Arizona state prisoner, 1 appeals pro se the district court's summary judgement in favor of the defendants, various prison officials, in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1291 and affirm. 3 * Background 4 In his amended complaint, Hernandez alleges that the defendants deprived him of protected liberty and due process interests by (1) misclassifying him as a sex offender based on his felony conviction for incest and (2) refusing to expunge his prison file of this erroneous classification. Hernandez contends that this classification resulted in his being denied work release and…