Groover v. County of San Diego Sheriff's Dept.

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul Steven GROOVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; City of San Diego Police Department; Drug Enforcement Agency; San Diego County District Attorney's Office, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55573. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge; HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul Steven Groover appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against the Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA"), two DEA agents and an informant ("individual defendants"), and others. The district court dismissed the action against the DEA pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, ruling that the DEA was immune from suit. The court dismissed the action as to the individual…