Ricardo Amador Huitron v. United States

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ricardo Amador HUITRON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-55805. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 30, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ricardo A. Huitron, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary denial of his habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . Huitron pled guilty to thirteen criminal charges related to distribution of cocaine and was sentenced to 108 months imprisonment. 1 Huitron contends that (1) he was deprived of a meaningful opportunity to review the presentence report prior to his sentencing in violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(A); (2) his due process rights were violated because he received no assistance of an interpreter during certain proceedings; (3) his attorney rendered ineffective assistance;…