Victor James Harrod, Jr. v. Glacier Steel Buildings, Inc. Tom Sullivan, President Jay Kiser, Operations Manager

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victor James HARROD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLACIER STEEL BUILDINGS, INC.; Tom Sullivan, President; Jay Kiser, Operations Manager, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35638. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Jan. 11, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Victor James Harrod, Jr. appeals pro se the district court's order of dismissal of his defamation action for lack of diversity jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. 3 The existence of subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law reviewed de novo. Nike, Inc. v. Comercial Iberica De Exclusivas, 20 F.3d 987 , 990 (9th Cir.1994). The district court's factual findings on all jurisdictional issues, however, must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. Id. 4 Harrod contends that the district court erred by determining that at the time the…