Garfias
Garfias v. City of Mesa
Opinion
Opinion
46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward GARFIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MESA; Guy Meeks, City of Mesa Police Department, Police Chief; Mesa Police Officer Badge No. 7320; and Mesa Police Duty Desk Sargeant; Karrp, Judge, and Harold H. Reeb, City of Mesa, Presiding City Magistrate; Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17307. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Feb. 1, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chapter 7 debtor Edward Garfias appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his bankruptcy appeal alleging that his traffic ticket debts had been discharged and that the City of Mesa, Arizona, and individual city and state employees (collectively "defendants") should be held in contempt for not honoring the allege discharge of the traffic tickets. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d),…