Jackson v. County of Los Angeles

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; William Stewart, Director, Internal Services Department, both individually & as Director; Fred C. Williams, Relations Representative, IRS, both individually & in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. No. 93-56064. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Dec. 8, 1994. * Decided: Jan. 4, 1995. Before: FARRIS, POOLE, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** I. JACKSON'S Sec. 1983 CLAIMS 2 Los Angeles County suspended Jackson for fifteen days for misusing a firearm and for leaving his post without authorization. Later Los Angeles County reassigned Jackson to an unarmed position. Jackson contends that these actions violated his rights under Sec. 1983. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 1994). We view the evidence in the light most…