Catlin Janjac and Ansly Janjac v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Catlin JANJAC and Ansly Janjac, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70479. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 9, 1994. Decided Jan. 10, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Catlin and Ansly Janjac seek review of a deportation order upheld by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The Janjacs contend that the immigration judge improperly admitted an Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) form at their deportation hearing, and erred in denying them a continuance of the hearing. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Catlin and Ansly Janjac, mother and son, were detained by the INS on October 21, 1991, near Key West, Florida. The INS instituted deportation proceedings, alleging that the Janjacs were Haitian citizens who entered the country without…