Bob Olsen, Devon Aviation, Fausto Cardenas, and Cesar Medina v. United States

46 F.3d 1143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bob OLSEN, Devon Aviation, Fausto Cardenas, and Cesar Medina, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55417. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Oct. 6, 1994. Decided: Jan. 27, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, BOOCHEVER, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Bob Olsen, Devon Aviation, Fausto Cardenas, and Cesar Medina ("Appellants"), who claim an interest in an airplane which was seized and administratively forfeited by the United States Customs Service, appeal the district court's denial of their motion for return of the property and their subsequent motion for reconsideration. The district court found that Appellants lacked standing to challenge the forfeiture of the plane. We affirm. 3 I. The District Court Did Not Err in Finding That Appellants Lacked Standing 4 A district court's determination of standing is a question of law that is…