Richard Morgan Morgan's Holiday Markets Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co Royal Insurance Company of America

46 F.3d 1143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard MORGAN; Morgan's Holiday Markets Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ROYAL INSURANCE CO; Royal Insurance Company of America, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-15763. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Feb. 2, 1995. Before: LAY, ** , PREGERSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 In this diversity case, Royal Insurance Co. and Royal Insurance Co. of America (collectively "Royal") appeal from a grant of partial summary judgment ruling that they were obligated to defend Richard Morgan and Morgan's Holiday Markets, Inc. (collectively "Morgan") in three suits filed against Morgan by Billy Davis in Shasta County Superior Court of California. All three of Davis's suits alleged Morgan intentionally allowed his cattle to overgraze and trespass on Davis's land located in Shasta County, California, but each suit related to a different time period and alleged…