Larry J. Olson v. Charles Cragin Daniel J. Stein U.H. Ang, M.D.

46 F.3d 1143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry J. OLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles CRAGIN; Daniel J. Stein; U.H. Ang, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35390. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Jan. 11, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Larry J. Olson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his claim against Board of Veterans' Appeals officials for denying him additional disability benefits. The district court dismissed Olson's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and for failure to state a claim upon…