Frank Orr v. R. G. Borg, Warden, Folsom State Prison William G. Prahl

46 F.3d 1143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank ORR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. G. BORG, Warden, Folsom State Prison; William G. Prahl, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-15857. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 30, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank Orr, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 writ of habeas corpus petition. Orr contends the trial court erred by allowing the prosecution to introduce out-of-court statements made by a nontestifying codefendant in violation of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968). Alleged violations of the Confrontation Clause are reviewed de novo. Paradis v. Arava, 20 F.3d 950, 956 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 1994 WL 676378 (U.S. Jan. 17, 1995) (No. 94-7017). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and we affirm. 3 In Bruton, the…