Gabriel Navarrete-Conradino v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

46 F.3d 1143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gabriel NAVARRETE-CONRADINO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70415. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Feb. 1, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gabriel Navarrete-Conradino, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge's ("IJ") decision finding him deportable and ineligible for any form of discretionary relief from deportation. 3 In his petition, Navarrete-Conradino does not challenge the merits of the IJ's decision, but instead contends that his due process rights were violated at his deportation hearing because the IJ denied his motion for a fourth continuance and ordered him to proceed without counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec.…