Avram Meyers v. Roadway Express, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation

Good Law
46 F.3d 1143·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7273
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 19, 199502-70109California926 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Avram MEYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, an Ohio corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16242. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Dec. 16, 1994. Decided: Jan. 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Avram Meyers appeals a judgment awarding him minimal damages. That judgment was based on an order granting partial summary judgment to Roadway Express, Inc., a common carrier, on the question of the amount of damages that Meyers may recover under the terms of a bill of lading. After the court granted partial summary judgment for Roadway on the damages question, Roadway agreed not to litigate the remaining issue concerning its liability for the damage. Accordingly, the district court entered judgment for Meyers for $786.52. That sum represented the property damage claim limited to $120, plus…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.