Richard G. Parrish v. Allstate Insurance Company

46 F.3d 1143 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard G. PARRISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15984. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Dec. 14, 1994. Decided: Jan. 6, 1995. Before: HUG, CANBY, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Richard Parrish appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendant Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate") on the ground that the district court erred in determining that Parrish failed to produce evidence that raised a genuine issue of fact as to pretext in his age discrimination and retaliatory discharge claims. Parrish further contends that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for Allstate on Parrish's contract claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. I. 3 We review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Lindahl v. Air France, 930 F.2d 1434, 1436 (9th Cir.…