In re Petroleum Recycling Corp.

Good Law
46 F.3d 1144·1995 WL 40324·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7309
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 199594-56167California213 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1144 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re PETROLEUM RECYCLING CORPORATION, a California Corporation, Debtor, Robert A. ZANDER; Karin Kirksey Zander, Appellants, v. PETROLEUM RECYCLING CORPORATION, a California corporation, Appellee. No. 94-56167. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 31, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Robert and Karen Zander appeal pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's order dismissing their appeal as untimely. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and we reverse the BAP's order of dismissal and remand for further proceedings in accordance with Arrowhead Estates Development Co. v. U.S. Trustee, Nos. 93-55530 and 93-56560, slip op. 15921, 15931 (9th Cir. Dec. 30, 1994). REVERSED AND REMANDED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.