Prudential Insurance v. Gary Lynn Losson Betty Jane Losson v. Gwendolyn Klein Losson, and Bari Lynne Losson

Good Law
46 F.3d 1144·1995 WL 15682·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7297
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 199593-36131California1,004 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1144 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE, Plaintiff, v. Gary Lynn LOSSON; Betty Jane Losson; Defendants-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn Klein Losson, Defendant-Appellee, and Bari Lynne Losson, Defendant. No. 93-36131. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 10, 1995 * Decided: Jan. 13, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, ** Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Prudential Insurance filed this interpleader action for a determination regarding which of several claimants is entitled to the life insurance proceeds of Richard Losson. Gwendolyn Klein Losson filed a motion for summary judgment. When Gary and Betty Losson failed to respond within the time allotted by Local Rules, the district court granted summary judgment to Gwendolyn Klein Losson. We affirm because we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Gary and Betty Losson's motion to set aside the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.